The Rights Activists On The Thoughts Of Animal Testing

Asking just about any animal rights activists on the thoughts of animal testing, it is reasonable to expect that the majority of them would address crucial flaws in many of the laws in regards to animals and how animals are supposedly â€Å"protected† by these laws. Trained scientists and researchers take on the key role of testing on animals in laboratories and facilities throughout the world, using the excuse that we are expanding knowledge and furthering medical research. In the United States alone, there are very few laws truly protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the research forces upon them with many exceptions. Additionally, in reference to the scientists who perform these tests, the author of the article,†¦show more content†¦Latham argues that â€Å"Perhaps more important, though, is the fact that the existing regulatory structure, imperfect though it may be, is elastic enough to accommodate substantial changes that could reduce unne cessary animal testing† (35). Latham accomplished his purpose thoroughly in supporting this as he organized all of the information properly, provides many examples of background facts, and presents information on other country’s animal testing laws, as well as in depth explanations justifying his ideas on how he believes reform can be achieved pertaining to animal experimentation laws and standards. Latham reflects upon animal testing laws and groups and goes into detail, clarifying them by giving the reader thorough background information on each. Throughout the article, Latham mentions numerous organizations and laws that are affiliated with the United States concerning animal experimentation, these organizations and laws include, the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Latham does an extremely well job in discussing similarities and differences extensively between the history and the making of animal testing